Продолжение поста: «некруглая дата», темы: «Фанаты и Жизнь»
Из всех Марсиев а.п. более всех симпатичны эти два: один - Веронезе, другой - Бронзино…
Цитата:
Attributed to Veronese. «Apollo and Marsyas».
Цитата:
Angelo Bronzino. «Sfida tra Aapollo e Marsia». 1532 г.
Цитата:
Detail. Angelo Bronzino. «Sfida tra Aapollo e Marsia». 1532 г.
Современным аналогом св. Варфоломея и Марсия является экорше(écorce) Жана-Антуана Гудона.
Цитата:
Р.Пил. Портрет Жана-Антуана Гудона. 1808.
Гудон готовился создать статую Иоана Крестителя и для этого исполнил гипсовую модель экорше.
Цитата:
Но, как мы знаем Иоана Крестителя казнили не армяне, т. е. никто кожи с него не сдирал: без хитростные евреи просто отрубили ему голову.
Тогда зачем Гудону потребовалось его свежевать?
По тому, что таковы были каноны скульптуры и живописи того времени.
Что бы придать форме реальную динамику нужно было снять «верхний слой».
Например, вот эскиз к картине Жака Луи Давида «Клятва в зале для игры в мяч»
Цитата:
Полагаете они спорили в костюмах Вини-Пуха?
Окончание поста: «некруглая дата», темы: «Фанаты и Жизнь», следует…
Последний раз редактировалось: Dimitriy (07.09.2024 5:09), всего редактировалось 4 раз(а)
Queen Elizabeth II statue mocked for looking more like Mrs Doubtfire
…
A new statue of the late Queen Elizabeth II has been the subject of mockery and indignation – and even likened to Mrs Doubtfire after its controversial unveiling.
Slammed for its posture, face, and alleged failure to resemble the late queen “in any way”, the bonze artwork has been causing controversy since it was unveiled at Antrim Castle Gardens in Northern Ireland on Friday (6 September).
Created by Belfast artist Anto Brennan, the council said the statue, which is accompanied by renderings of the late Prince Philip and the Queen’s beloved corgis, shows the queen “in a dignified pose, reflecting her grace, steadfastness and lifelong dedication to public service.”
The pieces were erected in tribute to the late queen, who passed away at the age of 96 on 8 September 2022 in Balmoral, Scotland.
She was the longest-reigning monarch in British history.
But visitors and commentators alike were left less than impressed by the rendering of the late queen, who was depicted wearing headscarf and padded jacket similar to those she was often photographed in while walking her dogs.
Some even went as far as to demand that the statue be melted down.
According to the BBC, Vera McWilliam, Antrim and Newtownabbey councillor, said: “We have to be honest, it does not resemble the queen in any shape or form.”
A local visitor, meanwhile, suggested that those responsible for the statues “need their eyes tested”.
“Whoever signed that off needs their eyes tested. It’s not good.
“I would take it away. It doesn’t do anything in memory for Her Majesty, so definitely I would remove it.”
One visitor from London said that while they appreciated the sentiment behind the statue, its lack of resemblance to the queen was hard to deny in their eyes.
But they did describe the other pieces in the installation as “nice”.
“As it is in her memory I guess it is a good thing but it doesn’t look like her,” they said. “The dogs and Prince Philip look nice, but the queen, it doesn’t look like her.”
The statue has proved so controversial that Newtownabbey Borough Council was forced to turn the comments off after sharing the new artworks on Facebook.
Paul Dunlop, Deputy Mayor of Antrim and Newtownabbey, said: “It’s down to personal taste, everyone has their own opinion, but it is what the sculpture represents that is important.”
The controversy surrounding the statue continued on Twitter/X, where users questioned its suitability as a tribute.
Reacting to the statues, one user joked: “Should have gone to Specsavers.” [sic]
A second meanwhile dubbed the statues a “waste of bronze” while a third said the pieces were proof that the material should not be used to depict people.
“That’s the funniest thing I’ve seen for a long time,” remarked a fourth.
A spokesperson for Newtownabbey Borough Council told The Independent: “The Council is delighted with the generally positive response to the new Queen Elizabeth II sculpture in Antrim Castle Gardens.
“It acknowledges that art can sometimes spark diverse opinions, but it’s important to emphasise that the sculpture has been warmly received by most who have seen it in person.
“The statue beautifully captures Her Majesty’s grace and steadfastness, standing as a fitting tribute to her extraordinary life and reign.”
Цитата:
Royal flop! Queen Elizabeth statue is a ‘monstrosity’ that ‘does not resemble her in any shape or form,’ locals say
...
God save the Queen — from bad art!
A new statue of Queen Elizabeth II has sparked a royal uproar among locals and elected officials in Northern Ireland — who say the artwork is a disrespectful “monstrosity” that “looks nothing like” Her Majesty.
“We have to be honest, it does not resemble the Queen in any shape or form,” Newtownabbey Councilor Vera McWilliam told BBC News.
The bronze sculpture, made by artist Anto Brennan, depicts the late Queen wearing a headscarf as she stands next to Prince Philip and two corgis at the Antrim Castle Gardens in Belfast.
The statue was unveiled on social media this week — and widely slammed as a stone-cold flop.
“I was rather confused who it was actually. If there wasn’t the caption underneath it probably would have taken about five minutes to work out who it was. There’s no similarity,” Richard Morris, an art historian and critic, told the Times of London. “The representation I think is entirely wrong, they really should have done better.”
“A gigantic garden gnome would have been better — a set of those would have been rather interesting,” he added.
Meanwhile, social media users fumed that the art was “definitely not the tribute she deserved” and called it an “insult to Her Majesty’s memory.”
“Whoever signed that off needs their eyes tested. It’s not good,” another commenter snarked.
The statue was commissioned by the town of Antrim in January 2023 to stand next to a pre-existing bronze sculpture of Prince Philip.
It’s meant to portray a young version of the Queen holding a handbag and gazing into the distance as her dogs look up at her.
But local critics said the statue’s face features a too-prominent nose and too-puffy cheeks to resemble the royal.
“The Queen is unrecognizable. She’s a catalogue countrywoman in a quilted gilet [vest]. The nose is too strong, the jaw too broad, the cheeks too swollen,” wrote London Times critic Laura Freeman.
But the artist did carve out one success, she said.
“Mind you, the corgis are good,” Freeman wrote.
A spokeswoman for the town council said responses to the new art had been “generally positive.”
“Art can sometimes spark diverse opinions, but it’s important to emphasize that the sculpture has been warmly received by most who have seen it in person,” she said.“The statue beautifully captures Her Majesty’s grace and steadfastness, standing as a fitting tribute to her extraordinary life and reign.”
Цитата:
_________________
С умилением и отраслевыми пожеланиями, Dimitriy.
Junk food TV ads to be banned pre-watershed in UK from October 2025
Online adverts for products high in fat, salt and sugar to be banned altogether and TV ads will air only after 9pm
Junk food TV advertisements are to be banned from airing before the 9pm watershed as part of the government’s drive to improve public health.
In addition, online ads for products that are high in fat, salt and sugar will be banned altogether, Andrew Gwynne, the public health minister, told the Commons on Thursday. Both measures will come into force on 1 October 2025.
Health campaigners welcomed the move as an overdue restriction on firms’ ability to bombard children with ads for their unhealthy food and drink products.
James Toop, the chief executive of Bite Back, which is part of the chef Jamie Oliver’s organisation, said: “This is fantastic news. These restrictions will help shield children from exposure to unhealthy food and drink advertising, which research shows significantly shapes their relationship with food.
“We know that the more junk food ads you see, the more unhealthy food you’re likely to consume. Restricting these ads will protect more young people from falling into this trap.”
The previous, Conservative government pledged to bring in the TV watershed ban from January 2023. But a month before its introduction, Rishi Sunak decided to delay it until 2025, prompting a wave of criticism that he had put the interests of big business ahead of improving children’s health.
Boris Johnson, one of Sunak’s predecessors, had planned to implement the same measure. But he too put off plans to do so, ostensibly to help families deal with the cost of living crisis. He was rebuked for doing so by the former Tory health ministers Dr Dan Poulter and James Bethell.
Katharine Jenner, the director of the Obesity Health Alliance, said: “For too long the food industry has consistently pushed back on these incoming restrictions on advertising unhealthy food on TV before 9pm, and online at any time, saying they need to have ‘more time to prepare’. Not any more.”
Gwynne told MPs in a written ministerial statement that Labour was taking action because of widespread concern about the number of children in England who are overweight.
“More than one in five children in England are overweight or living with obesity by the time they start primary school, and this rises to more than one-third by the time they leave,” he said. “We want to tackle the problem head on, and that incudes implementing the restrictions on junk food advertising on TV and online without further delay.”
Цитата:
Ban on junk food ads before 9pm to come into force next year
...
A 9pm watershed on TV junk food advertising will come into force in October 2025, the government has confirmed.
This will come alongside a total ban on paid-for online advertising for junk food, under plans to tackle childhood obesity.
The new rules deliver on a Labour manifesto commitment to implement the restrictions, with the timeline set out to "provide clarity" for businesses, health minister Andrew Gwynne said.
In a written ministerial statement confirming the plans, he said: "These restrictions will help protect children from being exposed to advertising of less healthy food and drinks, which evidence shows influences their dietary preferences from a young age."
Boris Johnson committed to a ban on junk food advertising before 9pm in 2021 when he was prime minister, but the plan was delayed twice.
The Tories said they wanted to review the impact of the restrictions on consumers and businesses in light of the cost of living crisis, and the measures would come into force in October 2025.
Mr Gwynne confirmed Labour would stick to that timeline, saying: "This provides the clarity that businesses have been calling for and will support them to prepare for the restrictions coming into force across the UK on 1 October 2025."
He said more than one in five children in England are overweight or living with obesity by the time they start primary school, and this rises to more than one third by the time they leave.
"We want to tackle the problem head-on on and that includes implementing the restrictions on junk food advertising on TV and online without further delay," he said.
To get the plans in motion, Labour has published the previous government's response to the 2022 consultation on the draft measures, which confirms the definitions for the products, businesses, and services in scope of the restrictions.
A four-week consultation will aim to clarify how the regulations will apply to Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), which delivers TV live on the web.
Last year a survey found eight out of 10 adults support a ban on advertising unhealthy food to children on TV and online.
The British Heart Foundation wants the government to go further and expand the ban to things like billboards, radio advertising and sports sponsorship, alongside a package of measures such as a salt and sugar tax.
These are not part of Labour's plans, though the manifesto did commit to banning the sale of energy drinks to under-16s.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has previously batted off "nany state" accusations, saying his party "won't stand by while children become fatter".
The new government's ambition is to "raise the healthiest generation ever", with a focus on prevention to help fix the NHS.
------------------------------------------------
Цитата:
NEWS12 December 2022
Junk food pre-watershed ad ban delayed
UK – The UK government has delayed the introduction of advertising restrictions on products that are high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) until 1st October 2025.
The restrictions will include a 9pm TV watershed for HFSS products and a restriction of paid-for HFSS advertising online.
The government first announced its intention to implement the watershed for HFSS product ads in July 2020. It is the second time the introduction of the ban has been delayed.
The government is also bringing forward secondary legislation covering areas including how products are defined in the scope of the ad restrictions, and how food and drink small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are defined for the purposes of the SME exemptions. The consultation on the secondary legislation will run until 31st March 2023.
Ad industry organisations the Advertising Association and the IAB have responded to the delay in the planned restrictions.
Stephen Woodford, chief executive, Advertising Association, said: "While it is helpful, for planning purposes, to have a clear timeframe for the new advertising restrictions to be implemented, we continue to believe that this is the wrong policy and will do nothing to tackle obesity.
"Addressing the challenges of obesity in this country require well-funded, multi-faceted programmes focused on making changes in local communities, not population-wide and non-targeted approaches like advertising bans."
Jon Mew, chief executive, IAB UK, said: "Throughout this process, we have been clear with government that clarity and certainty are essential for our industry to effectively adhere to the HFSS online ad ban.
"The new implementation date is welcome and shows that policymakers are listening. Our members now have longer to prepare for the ban and gain much-needed clarity from the government about exactly what’s in scope and how it will work in practice."
Цитата:
NEWS12 May 2021
Ad industry opposes online junk food ad ban
UK – Advertising industry bodies have criticised government plans for a ban on high-fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) foods advertising online and 9pm watershed on television after the policy was included in the Queen’s speech.
The Advertising Association (AA) and the Internet Advertising Bureau UK (IAB UK) have both heavily criticised the inclusion of the legislation in the Queen’s speech, which indicates the government’s legislative programme for the parliamentary session ahead.
A government consultation in November and December 2020 suggested removing all HFSS marketing communications from the internet that would be viewable to UK consumers. Separate proposals for a watershed for HFSS advertising were also announced last summer.
Stephen Woodford, chief executive of the AA, said the organisation was “dismayed” the bill was being introduced and warned of job losses in the advertising industry.
“The government’s own evidence shows that such measures will be ineffective in tackling obesity,” he said.
“The country needs balanced, consistent and well-evidenced policy interventions that will make a positive difference. The 9pm watershed and online ban will not reduce obesity levels, but will damage business and innovation and put jobs at risk.”
Jon Mew, chief executive of IAB UK, said an online advertising ban was not the solution to the complex problem of childhood obesity.
“The archaic action the government is taking disregards prevailing evidence relating to the causes of obesity and ignores smarter, digital-led solutions put forward by advertising’s regulatory body that could further limit children’s exposure to digital advertising in a proportionate and targeted way,” he said.
“In short, a ban is tokenistic, ill-considered policy that is entirely at odds with the government’s self-professed aim to establish the UK as a leader in digital and technological innovation.”
Mew added that the ban was not rooted in robust evidence, as it would only reduce children’s intake by 2.84 calories a day, and that previous attempts to restrict children’s access to HFSS advertising had done nothing to stop the rise in childhood obesity.
“Rather than resorting to draconian policy that will gravely impact the advertising sector, ad-funded media and hospitality sector at a vital time of recovery, we need to build on the progress already made with smarter, more sophisticated online advertising protections for children,” he said.
“The government has so far failed to make the case for a total online ban, and we urge it to reconsider the evidence-led solutions that can be delivered more quickly and effectively by the existing regulatory system.”
The Queen’s speech also included previously announced plans for an Online Harms Bill, which will attempt to tackle online racist abuse, uphold democratic debate online and try to prevent financial fraud on social media and dating apps.
Цитата:
NEWS11 November 2020
UK proposes online junk food advertising ban
UK – The government has launched a consultation on a total ban on advertising high fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) products online amid criticism from four advertising sector representative bodies.
An online-only consultation was published by the government on 10th November setting out its proposals as part of the UK’s obesity strategy. The consultation, which runs until the end of 22nd December, proposes removing all marketing communications from the internet that would be viewable to UK consumers.
However, the Advertising Association, Incorporated Society of British Advertisers, Institute of Practitioners in Advertising and the Internet Advertising Bureau UK have called the proposals “severe and disproportionate” in a statement.
The consultation claims that the difficulty in imposing an advertising watershed on the internet, like the 9pm watershed proposed for HFSS television advertising, and the growth in television streaming online means a total ban would be needed for its HFSS advertising restrictions to be effective.
“The increased estimates of children’s online media consumption strengthens the case for government acting to reduce children’s exposure to HFSS online and demonstrates the rising risk of children’s exposure in this media where children are spending an increasing amount of time,” states the consultation.
The ban would not relate to business to business marketing communications, factual claims about products and services, and communications with the purpose of facilitating an online sale.
The statement from the four industry bodies said that the proposals would do “untold harm” to the nation’s creative and food and drink sectors.
“The advertising sector is a proven engine of the UK economy, and we would urge ministers not to damage the jobs and tax revenue it creates,” the statement claims.
“The government is setting out headline-grabbing proposals, but we are far from convinced that they have made the case, or set out the evidence for, a heavy-handed intervention of this kind.
“We urge ministers to start engaging meaningfully with industry now, and to develop evidenced solutions that are targeted at the problem they wish to address, appropriate to digital media and fit for the 21st century.”
_________________
С завистью и отраслевыми пожеланиями, Dimitriy.
Нашлось побольше времени, послушал госдеп и Блинкена целиком.
Как с коррупцией.
В ИСО>ЕСО, например в России она преимущественно вертикальная, а в ЕСО>ИСО, например в США – преимущественно горизонтальная.
И вся борьба англосаксов с коррупцией, есть борьба с нашей коррупцией в пользу своей.
Подобно с «RT».
Маргарита Симоновна безусловно права, они вменяют «RT» ровно то, чем постоянно занимались, занимаются, планируют заниматься сами.
Подавляюще большинство либеральных СМИ – филиалы тех или иных «либеральных компетентных органов».
Бывает их даже не зачем все читать, посмотрел публикации одного СМИ с группы подобных и того довольно, методички одни и те же, тематические статьи выходят с ничтожным разнообразием.
И конечно возбудились они перед своими выборами по тому, что при всём, при том, что «почта, телеграф, телефон» уже захвачены, избирательные качества Камалы таковы, что серии скромных статей «RT» может оказаться более чем достаточно.
Цитата:
_________________
С сожалением и понятными пожеланиями, Dimitriy.
Уровень доступа: Вы не можете начинать темы, Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения, Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения, Вы не можете удалять свои сообщения, Вы не можете голосовать в опросах
Как не ошибиться с выбором формата обучения и предстать перед будущим работодателем успешным специалистом. Директор по маркетингу ведущего IT-холдинга Fplus Ирина Васильева рассказала, на что теперь смотрят работодатели при приеме на работу, как нестандартно можно развиваться в профессии и стоит ли действующим маркетологам обучаться на онлайн-курсах.
Эксперты ЮKassa (сервис для приёма онлайн- и офлайн-платежей финтех-компании ЮMoney) и RetailCRM (решение для управления заказами и клиентскими данными) провели исследование* и выяснили, почему пользователи не завершают покупки в интернет-магазинах. По данным опроса, две трети респондентов хотя бы раз оставляли заказы незавершёнными, чаще всего это электроника и бытовая техника, одежда и товары для ремонта. Вернуться к брошенным корзинам многих мотивируют скидки, кэшбэк и промокоды.
За пару недель создать ажиотаж вокруг фильма, чтобы все писали о смелом промо, а зрители сметали билеты на премьеру? Маркетинг впечатлений — это искусство, которым Голливуд владеет в совершенстве. Как использовать его принципы в рекламе, рассказывает генеральный директор Mera (by Okkam) Мария Силкина.
Владимир Нерюев, заместитель Генерального директора коммуникационного агентства АУРА (в составе Газпром-Медиа Холдинга) поделился мнением, как искусственный интеллект (ИИ) стал неотъемлемой частью многих сфер нашей жизни, включая рекламу.
Чего не хватает радио, чтобы увеличить свою долю на рекламном рынке? Аудиопиратство: угроза или возможности для отрасли? Каковы первые результаты общероссийской кампании по продвижению индустриального радиоплеера? Эти и другие вопросы были рассмотрены на конференции «Радио в глобальной медиаконкуренции», спикерами и участниками которой стали эксперты ГПМ Радио.
Деловая программа 28-й международной специализированной выставки технологий и услуг для производителей и заказчиков рекламы «Реклама-2021» открылась десятым юбилейным форумом «Матрица рекламы». Его организовали КВК «Империя» и «Экспоцентр».
28 марта в Центральном доме художника состоялась 25-ая выставка маркетинговых коммуникаций «Дизайн и реклама NEXT». Одним из самых ярких её событий стал День социальной рекламы, который организовала Ассоциация директоров по коммуникациям и корпоративным медиа России (АКМР) совместно с АНО «Лаборатория социальной рекламы» и оргкомитетом LIME.
На VII Международном форуме «Матрица рекламы», прошедшем в ЦВК «Экспоцентр» в рамках международной выставки «Реклама-2018», большой интерес у профессиональной аудитории вызвала VI Конференция «Интернет-реклама».
RSS